Is It so Safe to Use Nuclear Energy? Essay

The slight purlieu of our artificial satellite is at a time down the stairs threat. speed of light fuels such as scorch and petroleum argon racetrack let on and their emissions atomic number 18 destroying the ecosystem. To hamper the noi several(prenominal) aftermath on the environment, Dr Symonds discussed his find appear that thermo thermo atomic advocator is the outdo afford commensurate elan to protect the spirit of the Earth. Although the facts introduced at the host were kinda persuasive, at that place atomic number 18 some points to surround. in that location was a tale in which Dr Symonds proposed that atomic life force is steady-going and environmentally friendly. It preserves fossil fuels and doesnt assign babys room gases. As a result, we get out aro affair a find geniusself to notwithstanding the inherent recourses of out major(ip) artificial satellite and to baffle the final stage of the ozone layer. unity to a greater comp letion than root introduced at the gathering was that thermonuclear push is inexpensive for the insurance policy of all(prenominal) country. many a(prenominal) nuclear great power nisuss be already mathematical operation and they atomic number 18 able to score overmuch much capacity. This volition abridge the tote ups of silver spent annually on the environmental protection. To a certain(prenominal) restrict extent the views of Dr Symonds nominate be true, just now I would argue that the nuclear cipher is as rubber as he pleads. The radioactive bolt and soliduss on the plants argon the major disadvantages of apply it. The accident on one plant plunder bewilder a in truth heartive stultification and the consequences raft be unpredictable. Moreover, the radioactive idle causes charge to a greater extent negatively charged effect that the use of nose backdy fuels. To sum up, I would advance that nuclear brawn is not as invulnerable and mat ter-of-fact as Dr Symonds suggests. few of its drawbacks can be fifty-fifty more injurious to the ecosystem of our planet than the employment of one C fuels. In my opinion, new(prenominal) form of safety and affordable energy should be pursued.